19 Comments

There is a Globalist Regime. It is THEM. And they are against US. The Regime owns the media and tech. The Regime has been engaged in a giant multi trillion dollar looting game. The risk to their game is populist voter uprising like Brexit, Javier Milei, the defeat of the German Green party, and Trump. The Regime censors content that has the potential for informing the population of things that pose a risk to the Regime looting game. This includes censoring any article that explains the censorship methods of the Regime.

Look at the ownership of all the big media corporations and big tech... Blackrock, Vanguard, State Street and a few other big trillion dollar asset management firms own controlling interest in all of them. Wall Street owns controlling interest in all of them. The billionaires that have their assets managed by these companies own controlling interest in all of them. They are the Regime and they are screwing 80% of the rest of the country, US, to keep up a breathtaking transfer of wealth to THEM. They have billions and they want trillions. They are looting the US to an empty shell to get there. Their media propaganda is well designed to cause partisan anger to get uninformed media algorithm hypnotized people to support them. They cannot allow the truth and facts to upset their game. So they post propaganda and censor truth and facts to keep their game alive.

Expand full comment

Comment of the Week right here. Bravo! 👏👏👏

Expand full comment

I have a tiny satire news site just for Maui island. Facebook for about two years now has limited the reach of my Maui Insight group page. It's membership has been frozen at the same figure for months. Reason? Who knows? They never explain. Might be because I published comically satirical takes on the Covid response, vaccines, and censorship (ironically).

Expand full comment

- YESS…!! I, TOO, AM FIGHTING A GOOD FIGHT AGAINST F/B REPEATEDLY FOR THE SAME REASONS…

!!!

I S IT “POLITICS” / ABUSE// PERSONAL OPINIONS … ???

W H A T ..??

Expand full comment

This has been happening at YouTube way before con-vid.

They would slap dmca claims on videos that played a clip that had only seconds of a song. People complained but YouTube didn't give a shit and kept letting it happen.

YouTube also will delete comments that have certain key words.

Facebook was always like that too. They had automatic blocking of certain words and links.

Nowadays we also see that on X/Twitter with substack posts being not clickable.

It's about time we turn these monopolies into public utilities. After all, the phone company cannot censor you because your said this or that, why should social media? They enjoy section 230 protection which gives them immunity, but then still censor.

There's also this ridiculous shit that private companies can do whatever they want... Once again, the phone company can't why should they?

Also, knowing that there are back doors to these companies, obviously the govt or Intel agencies can easily censor without anyone knowing it was them. I'm surprised that they did what they did in the open, leading to cases. Why do it in public when they can be sued or called out?!?

Expand full comment

YouTube has been preventing me from being able to watch ANY of their "age restricted" or "violent content" videos even when signed in and after clicking to proceed anyway. As soon as I do I get a frozen black screen with the same "restricted" message and the videos never play.

Expand full comment

> "It’s almost as if Facebook’s “Community Guidelines” are meant to be abused."

Hahahaha. Matt, you're a treasure!

Expand full comment

It’s infuriating, honestly.

Expand full comment

It’s alarming.

Expand full comment

I wish more people felt this way. We’ve been in deep state censorship for years. We collectively need to wake-up.

Expand full comment

Well done Matt! It means you're "over the target" and discussing important issues that society MUST discuss.

.

They Lied. Join the campaign to Take Action and Raise Public Awareness at 

https://TheyLied.ca/

.

Expand full comment

You are too good for those mendacious tyrants at FB, Matt.

Expand full comment

This was my solution.: delete all FBI accounts

Expand full comment

Clearly a lot of people are not only frustrated but genuinely concerned about FB, X (Twitter), YouTube, etc. censoring any post or person they want without legitimate reasons or any repercussions. I’ve seen comments on this post and others wherein people wish there was a way to solve this problem but with the mega corps owning all the platforms and calling all the shots, we’re at a loss as to what we can do.

I dont’ know very much about this “alternative” but I wonder about GAB. They supposedly are a free speech platform and the founder was cancelled by EVERYONE and so he created his own platform, bought his own servers (couldn’t use Amazon SES), has his own tech team, …

Does anyone know if this is a legit alternative?

Expand full comment

Don’t hold your breath for a wake up moment. The fact that it’s everything and everywhere proves the astonishing growth and maturity of the whole operation. You’re either in on the game or swimming upstream from it, ultimately to no avail I would argue.

Expand full comment

F*ck Zuckerberg and FB. They were censoring me live using their chat. You should try sending the Substack links to someone in chat. I bet they do it there too. Absolute joke of a platform.

Expand full comment

Instead of social media users getting fired one by one, how about a social media general strike? What if everyone stopped using Facebook for a day? Or a week? Or ever?

Their power comes from each of us giving up our own tiny bit of power to them.

Expand full comment

If I were Thomas Pynchon, I would conclude there is a giant conspiracy to stop anyone who might change the minds of the Dems and the Liberal, Woke agenda. Or could endanger the Iron Dome.

Expand full comment

Yesterday when I saw your email stating Facebook had censored you, I posted the link on my Facebook page. Immediately, it said "we have removed your post." Their "explanation" was that my posting it was an attempt to gain a large number of "likes" by posting "misleading information." This empty B.S. answer about trying to "get likes" is their standard. How ironic, given that their entire platform originated the entire priciple of "likes," yet they want us to believe that getting "likes" is something to be punished.

but, they can't be honest, so I guess this is the best, lame answer they could come up with. They NEVER identify what, exactly, is "misleading."

The also included a threat. If I try it again, I can "be suspended." For what, again? attempting to "get likes" for content they can't even define as misleading.

Expand full comment