Good compilation and it's good to be aware when the media cranks up the heat. Media behaving like this reminds me of Radio Rwanda, laying the foundation for atrocities.
If y’all lack the perspicacity to see the difference between the dehumanization of public figures and public officials vs the dehumanization of classes of private folks then I’m not sure what to tell you.
WaPo and all of these dumbasses are telling their readers their fellow citizens who think differently are supporting rats.
Trump is telling supporters that their fellow citizens who think differently ARE rats.
It’s disingenuous to refer to it as “calling communists and fascists vermin” when they’re throwing communist around like a blue hair college student may throw around fascist.
"We pledge to you that we will root out the communists, Marxists, fascists, and the radical left thugs that live like vermin within the confines of our country," is not talk of politicians. Fuck WaPo, but there is a fairly clear distinction you’re obfuscating.
For petes sake, rats fleeing a sinking ship is a common metaphor where the focus is usually on the spectacle of the damn ship than the nature of the rats.
Bravo, this is brilliant propaganda for folks to nod along to.
Oh no! Good thing corporate media isn’t demonizing trump supporters. Meanwhile, trump is demonizing people who vote against him directly.
Private citizens/public officials. That distinction matters. The vermin talk about classes of so called “enemies of the people” was what led to the actual holocaust.
Trump supporters aren’t called rats in the MSM. 2016 happened and there were 5000 NYT rural Ohio diner articles and numerous genuine attempts at understanding and humanizing trump supporters. Many folks who actively demonized trump directly were doing this.
When 2020 happened was there ANY attempt from conservative media to do the same?
The actual radical left is disgusted with Dresden and Tokyo and Gaza. As are probably the broadest swathes of America for the first two.
I don’t need to make that post, the author of this one did. Notice that you’re only fed headlines, not really given any way to look at them. It’s obfuscated. Note the link for the “trump rat” wapo search he gave only contains ONE DAMN ARTICLE related, and it’s factual reporting about (albeit incendiary) something somebody ELSE is doing. The author of this makes it hard for you to find nuance for a reason; it makes it easier to keep you nodding along happily.
The examples this author gave honestly make the argument for me if you actually read them, but he doesn’t want you to, hence the screenshots of headlines. After all, those are always perfect encapsulations of the article, why would you ever need to read them since they exist? Pure and exactly as the author intended, not editorialized or wrought with intent to maximize income moreso than any other component of an article.
NYT has a factual piece about Biden speaking at the picket line and it references bad polling, conveniently done by the NYT, like five times within that article. Completely irrelevant to the context, but just HAS to stress that fact.
That’s all I got, it was pre-nomination and just fluff that the dude pulled out of his ass, not a single interview or even an ATTEMPT to do so. The only other thing, “understanding how Biden REALLY wins elections” is, once again, accusations of fraud.
Checked duckduckgo AND google. SQUAT.
You don’t read the mainstream media, how do you know your assessment is correct?
You don’t know what to say because you have NOTHING to say or back your shit up but VIBES. Does conservative media humanize Biden or Hillary voters? I can at least point to attempts. Even actual leftist media like Jacobin humanizes trump voters
Here’s the thing, you’re confidently stating what the majority of their coverage is based off of the information presented to you by somebody whose financial interest is hammering home how bullshit they are.
Do you see where, through no fault or incapacity of your own, that may lead to your perception being flawed? Is it realistic that what Jimmy Dore presents is the majority of articles put out across all of the MSM? Is Jimmy Dore’s thing to give the fairest shake possible to them, or might there be pressure elsewhere? I’ll be 100% honest, I haven’t listened or watched enough to give him the fairest shake
I don’t say that to imply that my perception doesn’t possess the same shortcomings based off of where I get my media, because it absolutely does.
WAPO - best rag written by the CIA/FBI/DOJ and NYC elites that money can buy. NYC billionaires are in clearly charge of academia, government, media, Hollywood and deep state.
The applicable term in what used to be called the news business, is "hacks."
I'm not a Trump voter or a Democratic one, but I've lost patience with one-note journalists who are happy to serve as cheerleaders for their preferred teams.
Rats are amazing creatures, and those mice and rats and rodents are what give the Jewish Jab Makers (well, they didn't use THAT many mice on that mRNA bioweapon, but still . . .) their billions as they test more and more gain of function poisons for future use.
But, rabid rats, that's what Republicans are. What Democrats are could be stated earily too: neutered rats.
Imagine if I called the IDF a bunch of rabid rats? Or any Israeli official with the Yellow Star of Genocide on their lapels -- rats!
Now, there are plent of rats in congress:
The Republican-drafted resolution declares that the House of Representatives "clearly and firmly states that anti-Zionism is antisemitism."
Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-NY), the most senior Jewish member of the House, criticized the language of the bill ahead of the vote. "The resolution suggests that ALL anti-Zionism is antisemitism. That is either intellectually disingenuous or just factually wrong. And it unfairly implicates many of my orthodox former constituents in Brooklyn, many of whose families rose from the ashes of the Holocaust," he said.
Nadler claimed that "most anti-Zionism is antisemitism" but added that if authors of the bill "were at all familiar with Jewish history and culture, should know about Jewish anti-Zionism that was, and is, expressly NOT antisemitic."
+--+
“There are over 200 synagogues in our community that officially disavow Zionism”. Greater Brooklyn boasts even more than that.
Guess what, we are all antisemites according to the ‘Anti-Zionism is Antisemitism’ resolution in Congress…
Well, what could be more stupid that using an innocent species to characterize any member of OUR species.
Ok, Ok, I do get the point of the hypocrisy, but as the most damaging species on the planet, there's another level of hypocrisy involved here, as well.
Orf, you NAILED IT, AGAIN!
It’s like the MainStream media line up to expose their many hypocrisys to you, all day every day.
Well done again ORF! Hopefully one of your terrific videos is in the works to encapsulate this latest hypocrisy. I look forward to it!
You don’t understand, it’s different
Good compilation and it's good to be aware when the media cranks up the heat. Media behaving like this reminds me of Radio Rwanda, laying the foundation for atrocities.
Typically biased media.
Republicans are sexually inadequate cockroaches. Democrats are pestiferous vermin.
If y’all lack the perspicacity to see the difference between the dehumanization of public figures and public officials vs the dehumanization of classes of private folks then I’m not sure what to tell you.
WaPo and all of these dumbasses are telling their readers their fellow citizens who think differently are supporting rats.
Trump is telling supporters that their fellow citizens who think differently ARE rats.
It’s disingenuous to refer to it as “calling communists and fascists vermin” when they’re throwing communist around like a blue hair college student may throw around fascist.
"We pledge to you that we will root out the communists, Marxists, fascists, and the radical left thugs that live like vermin within the confines of our country," is not talk of politicians. Fuck WaPo, but there is a fairly clear distinction you’re obfuscating.
For petes sake, rats fleeing a sinking ship is a common metaphor where the focus is usually on the spectacle of the damn ship than the nature of the rats.
Bravo, this is brilliant propaganda for folks to nod along to.
Oh no! Good thing corporate media isn’t demonizing trump supporters. Meanwhile, trump is demonizing people who vote against him directly.
Private citizens/public officials. That distinction matters. The vermin talk about classes of so called “enemies of the people” was what led to the actual holocaust.
Trump supporters aren’t called rats in the MSM. 2016 happened and there were 5000 NYT rural Ohio diner articles and numerous genuine attempts at understanding and humanizing trump supporters. Many folks who actively demonized trump directly were doing this.
When 2020 happened was there ANY attempt from conservative media to do the same?
The actual radical left is disgusted with Dresden and Tokyo and Gaza. As are probably the broadest swathes of America for the first two.
I don’t need to make that post, the author of this one did. Notice that you’re only fed headlines, not really given any way to look at them. It’s obfuscated. Note the link for the “trump rat” wapo search he gave only contains ONE DAMN ARTICLE related, and it’s factual reporting about (albeit incendiary) something somebody ELSE is doing. The author of this makes it hard for you to find nuance for a reason; it makes it easier to keep you nodding along happily.
The examples this author gave honestly make the argument for me if you actually read them, but he doesn’t want you to, hence the screenshots of headlines. After all, those are always perfect encapsulations of the article, why would you ever need to read them since they exist? Pure and exactly as the author intended, not editorialized or wrought with intent to maximize income moreso than any other component of an article.
NYT has a factual piece about Biden speaking at the picket line and it references bad polling, conveniently done by the NYT, like five times within that article. Completely irrelevant to the context, but just HAS to stress that fact.
https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/4242013-trumps-supporters-are-right-in-front-of-you-quietly-living-among-us/amp/
https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2023/07/14/masculinity-polling-00105414
https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2024/01/trump-2024-win-american-identity/676143/
https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2023/09/05/politics/donald-trump-supporters-issues-poll/index.html
https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2023/08/22/politics/trump-gop-debate-fault-lines/index.html
https://www.forbes.com/sites/bowmanmarsico/2017/06/23/who-were-donald-trumps-voters-now-we-know/amp/
I got alll of those from the FIRST PAGE when I googled “understanding Trump voters”.
I search “Understanding hillary voters fox news” “understanding biden voters fox news”, and the same for National Review.
https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/09/inside-the-mind-of-the-biden-voter/amp/
That’s all I got, it was pre-nomination and just fluff that the dude pulled out of his ass, not a single interview or even an ATTEMPT to do so. The only other thing, “understanding how Biden REALLY wins elections” is, once again, accusations of fraud.
Checked duckduckgo AND google. SQUAT.
You don’t read the mainstream media, how do you know your assessment is correct?
You don’t know what to say because you have NOTHING to say or back your shit up but VIBES. Does conservative media humanize Biden or Hillary voters? I can at least point to attempts. Even actual leftist media like Jacobin humanizes trump voters
https://jacobin.com/2017/01/trump-election-democrats-gop-clinton-whites-workers-rust-belt
Would you EVER see something like that in Breitbart?
Here’s the thing, you’re confidently stating what the majority of their coverage is based off of the information presented to you by somebody whose financial interest is hammering home how bullshit they are.
Do you see where, through no fault or incapacity of your own, that may lead to your perception being flawed? Is it realistic that what Jimmy Dore presents is the majority of articles put out across all of the MSM? Is Jimmy Dore’s thing to give the fairest shake possible to them, or might there be pressure elsewhere? I’ll be 100% honest, I haven’t listened or watched enough to give him the fairest shake
I don’t say that to imply that my perception doesn’t possess the same shortcomings based off of where I get my media, because it absolutely does.
WAPO - best rag written by the CIA/FBI/DOJ and NYC elites that money can buy. NYC billionaires are in clearly charge of academia, government, media, Hollywood and deep state.
The applicable term in what used to be called the news business, is "hacks."
I'm not a Trump voter or a Democratic one, but I've lost patience with one-note journalists who are happy to serve as cheerleaders for their preferred teams.
Rats are amazing creatures, and those mice and rats and rodents are what give the Jewish Jab Makers (well, they didn't use THAT many mice on that mRNA bioweapon, but still . . .) their billions as they test more and more gain of function poisons for future use.
But, rabid rats, that's what Republicans are. What Democrats are could be stated earily too: neutered rats.
Imagine if I called the IDF a bunch of rabid rats? Or any Israeli official with the Yellow Star of Genocide on their lapels -- rats!
Now, there are plent of rats in congress:
The Republican-drafted resolution declares that the House of Representatives "clearly and firmly states that anti-Zionism is antisemitism."
Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-NY), the most senior Jewish member of the House, criticized the language of the bill ahead of the vote. "The resolution suggests that ALL anti-Zionism is antisemitism. That is either intellectually disingenuous or just factually wrong. And it unfairly implicates many of my orthodox former constituents in Brooklyn, many of whose families rose from the ashes of the Holocaust," he said.
Nadler claimed that "most anti-Zionism is antisemitism" but added that if authors of the bill "were at all familiar with Jewish history and culture, should know about Jewish anti-Zionism that was, and is, expressly NOT antisemitic."
+--+
“There are over 200 synagogues in our community that officially disavow Zionism”. Greater Brooklyn boasts even more than that.
Guess what, we are all antisemites according to the ‘Anti-Zionism is Antisemitism’ resolution in Congress…
https://x.com/TorahJews/status/1732166576403529857?s=20
WaPo is trash and so appropriate for being the swamp daily rag
their juvenile “journalism” makes Trump more popular by the day
(and wasn’t the term also repeatedly applied to the control group who declined the clot shot🧐?)
My only question about these left hypocrites is do they know they are doing the hypocrite thing, or do they actually not see it?
The answer does not improve their stock, but might help explain their malady.
My belief is that they obsoletely know it but they are generally not good people. They lie for a living.
Refresh my memory please. When did Biden call republicans vermin?
I wonder what they called the unvaccinated?
Well, that's insulting. But we'll sue only when they call us rats «politicians».
Well, what could be more stupid that using an innocent species to characterize any member of OUR species.
Ok, Ok, I do get the point of the hypocrisy, but as the most damaging species on the planet, there's another level of hypocrisy involved here, as well.