YouTube no longer has a “Covid-19” policy but a newly expanded policy to ban *any* “medical misinformation” that contradicts WHO or local health authorities (like CDC) regarding substances and prevention, treatment, or denial of health conditions.
I continue to feel the need to tell you Matt Orfalea, I purged my use of Google/ YouTube because of censorship of your 2016 / 2020 election denial comparison video...
That is the death nail to Youtube for me. I recommend everyone contact their favorite channels and urge them to first catalogue their videos on Youtube and then move to another platform with their entire catalogue, only leaving 1 video behind explaining where the original content can now be found.
I don’t think the “denial” part is anything but vague and odious. I’m sorry but any of these agencies could invent a disease out of thin air and have it exist only in theory, and if I deny its existence I’d be in the wrong. Insanity.
WHO/ CDC: "We won't contradict Big Pharma's marketing narratives and associated products"
Doctors: "We have to say whatever the government tells us to say or we will be struck off"
Government: "We've pledged our allegiance to the WHO too"
I really don't see any problem here. By their own admission they all work for Big Pharma which means they have already removed themselves from the medical/ scientific arena. They are all vaccine sales reps (to put it bluntly).
So they should not be considered useful sources of medical or scientific information, discussion or debate. By their own admission they do not provide such services.
Have I missed something?
I'm addicted to chocolate cake and I won't entertain any discussion about vegetables or fresh fruit. Are you going to use me as a source of dietary advice or discussion?
If your answer is 'yes' then you're the idiot. I literally TOLD you am not interested in anything but cake! :)
Of course there are quack treatments out there. But we have the right to research and make that determination for ourselves and should not have our information “pre-filtered” by Ministry of Truth GloboCap minions who stand to profit from the suppression of alternative treatments that threaten the Medical-Pharmaceutical Industrial Complex.
Regarding diabetes, for example, the American Diabetes Association’s recommendations have long been a recipe for insulin resistance and lifelong dependency on insulin. Those who possess the gumption to conduct their own research discover that a low-carb, high-fat diet combined with intermittent fasting can reverse their diabetes, as countless people have done, my husband included.
In 1942 Sidney Burwell told students of Harvard Medical School "Half of what we are going to teach you is wrong, and half of it is right. Our problem is that we don’t know which half is which." The aphorism continues to repeated (at least, it was up though my wife's medical school in 2003).
If we had a way to censor dissenting views from official and mainstream medicine through the ages, how much longer might bloodletting, miasma theory, mercury tinctures, lobotomies, vioxx, or any number of uncountable medical practices and procedures that turned out to do more harm than good have persisted.
But now? Now we have suddenly devised a foolproof way to separate fact from fiction? The What from the Chaff? We are certain that our new science is impervious to the failures of the old? CDC head Robert Redfield claimed that adopting cloth masks could "Drive the pandemic to it's knees" 3 years. That was false, yet dissenting views should be censored? Albert Bourla said 100% of the people in a South Africa study were immune to Covid following his vaccine? Dissent to that claim should be censored?
Let us go through the messy and complicated search for truth. We don't need to be protected from "bad ideas". Because often enough the good ideas are wrong too.
This is so helpful. I was looking just last week at YouTube’s terms to see if I could yet post videos about ivermectin court cases (not promotion for treatment) and now glad I didn’t risk it. The whole platform is useless on anything COVID or pandemic.
Oh, so now you’re promoting cancer?! It’s only a matter of time before you’re singing herpes’ praises, or recommending people give IBS a spin. I’m not leaving the house until Wolf Blitzer gives the “all clear”, THAT’S fer darn tootin !
I wonder if this is aimed at the metabolic theory and Warburg's explanation of cancer? Total layman here but it certainly seems to challenge the cancer treatment profit grift in our health care system.
CENSORSHIPsteria: Best Censorship Memes (+Elon's Free Speech Twitter Psyop!)
- But you give them no reach Elon, they are laughing at us, 1984, times have changed, trust the experts + government and more censorship memes + Elon's free speech Twitter psyop!
Yes, we all know that the CDC and WHO are the ultimate authority. Sure, they were wrong about the masks and the vaccines, but anyone can have a little slip-up.
And FB, You Tube and pretty much ALL the progressive media censored important information that we all have a right to consider, but, hey, mistakes were made. Let bygones be bygones, right? WRONG. I figured out a long time ago that governments are made out of people, and I have seen nothing to convince me that they're the smart ones.
Media wonks are not scientists, and are essentially clueless regarding science and healthcare. So, of course they should be deciding what we get to see and read about science and healthcare. Thank God we have places to go now where we can seek whatever info we want. We have Rumble, Substack, Locals, and countless other sites that progressives are desperate to shut down. It's a brand-new world, where we no longer have to abide by progressive BS.
I continue to feel the need to tell you Matt Orfalea, I purged my use of Google/ YouTube because of censorship of your 2016 / 2020 election denial comparison video...
Thanks for being the straw 👍
That is the death nail to Youtube for me. I recommend everyone contact their favorite channels and urge them to first catalogue their videos on Youtube and then move to another platform with their entire catalogue, only leaving 1 video behind explaining where the original content can now be found.
I don’t think the “denial” part is anything but vague and odious. I’m sorry but any of these agencies could invent a disease out of thin air and have it exist only in theory, and if I deny its existence I’d be in the wrong. Insanity.
Or the reverse. They say something is normal and you call it a disease.
“YouTube doesn’t allow content that poses a serious risk of egregious harm by spreading medical misinformation …”
Here insert the For the Better, Right? meme (https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/for-the-better-right) along with the caption:
“You mean disinformation from the WHO, CDC, NIH, and FDA, right?”
Voìla!
https://substack.com/@margaretannaalice/note/c-22914711
YOUTUBE: "We won't contradict WHO/ CDC"
WHO/ CDC: "We won't contradict Big Pharma's marketing narratives and associated products"
Doctors: "We have to say whatever the government tells us to say or we will be struck off"
Government: "We've pledged our allegiance to the WHO too"
I really don't see any problem here. By their own admission they all work for Big Pharma which means they have already removed themselves from the medical/ scientific arena. They are all vaccine sales reps (to put it bluntly).
So they should not be considered useful sources of medical or scientific information, discussion or debate. By their own admission they do not provide such services.
Have I missed something?
I'm addicted to chocolate cake and I won't entertain any discussion about vegetables or fresh fruit. Are you going to use me as a source of dietary advice or discussion?
If your answer is 'yes' then you're the idiot. I literally TOLD you am not interested in anything but cake! :)
I am a big fan but there are indeed garbage advertisements for instant “cures” of cancer and diabetes, for example.
From your posting I didn’t see how Google, a bastion of censorship, goes beyond cancer...
Perhaps I didn’t read your fine reprints close enough. In that case I apologize.
Of course there are quack treatments out there. But we have the right to research and make that determination for ourselves and should not have our information “pre-filtered” by Ministry of Truth GloboCap minions who stand to profit from the suppression of alternative treatments that threaten the Medical-Pharmaceutical Industrial Complex.
Regarding diabetes, for example, the American Diabetes Association’s recommendations have long been a recipe for insulin resistance and lifelong dependency on insulin. Those who possess the gumption to conduct their own research discover that a low-carb, high-fat diet combined with intermittent fasting can reverse their diabetes, as countless people have done, my husband included.
In 1942 Sidney Burwell told students of Harvard Medical School "Half of what we are going to teach you is wrong, and half of it is right. Our problem is that we don’t know which half is which." The aphorism continues to repeated (at least, it was up though my wife's medical school in 2003).
If we had a way to censor dissenting views from official and mainstream medicine through the ages, how much longer might bloodletting, miasma theory, mercury tinctures, lobotomies, vioxx, or any number of uncountable medical practices and procedures that turned out to do more harm than good have persisted.
But now? Now we have suddenly devised a foolproof way to separate fact from fiction? The What from the Chaff? We are certain that our new science is impervious to the failures of the old? CDC head Robert Redfield claimed that adopting cloth masks could "Drive the pandemic to it's knees" 3 years. That was false, yet dissenting views should be censored? Albert Bourla said 100% of the people in a South Africa study were immune to Covid following his vaccine? Dissent to that claim should be censored?
Let us go through the messy and complicated search for truth. We don't need to be protected from "bad ideas". Because often enough the good ideas are wrong too.
This is so helpful. I was looking just last week at YouTube’s terms to see if I could yet post videos about ivermectin court cases (not promotion for treatment) and now glad I didn’t risk it. The whole platform is useless on anything COVID or pandemic.
Oh, so now you’re promoting cancer?! It’s only a matter of time before you’re singing herpes’ praises, or recommending people give IBS a spin. I’m not leaving the house until Wolf Blitzer gives the “all clear”, THAT’S fer darn tootin !
One does not question the Ministry.
I wonder if this is aimed at the metabolic theory and Warburg's explanation of cancer? Total layman here but it certainly seems to challenge the cancer treatment profit grift in our health care system.
My thoughts exactly.
I INCLUDED A LINK TO YOUR POST IN TODAY'S POST:
CENSORSHIPsteria: Best Censorship Memes (+Elon's Free Speech Twitter Psyop!)
- But you give them no reach Elon, they are laughing at us, 1984, times have changed, trust the experts + government and more censorship memes + Elon's free speech Twitter psyop!
https://covidsteria.substack.com/p/best-censorship-memes-twitter-free-speech-psyop
I'm sorry, but after the most recent UN furball, I no longer trust the WHO, the CDC, the FDA, or the NIH.
The truth be damned ;)
Censorship pure and simple
Yes, we all know that the CDC and WHO are the ultimate authority. Sure, they were wrong about the masks and the vaccines, but anyone can have a little slip-up.
And FB, You Tube and pretty much ALL the progressive media censored important information that we all have a right to consider, but, hey, mistakes were made. Let bygones be bygones, right? WRONG. I figured out a long time ago that governments are made out of people, and I have seen nothing to convince me that they're the smart ones.
Media wonks are not scientists, and are essentially clueless regarding science and healthcare. So, of course they should be deciding what we get to see and read about science and healthcare. Thank God we have places to go now where we can seek whatever info we want. We have Rumble, Substack, Locals, and countless other sites that progressives are desperate to shut down. It's a brand-new world, where we no longer have to abide by progressive BS.
Who cares about the Goebbelstube.